Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/349/2002 Of Daga Fibres P.ltd v. Th...

Itxa/349/2002 Of Daga Fibres P.ltd v. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Circule-4 (1)(4) And Ors

High Court 18 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/349/2002 Of Daga Fibres P.ltd v. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Circule-4 (1)(4) And Ors
Date of order
18 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/349/2002 Of Daga Fibres P.ltd v. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Circule-4 (1)(4) And Ors, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: Appeal is dismissed in limine.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 349 OF 2002 Daga Fibres Pvt.Ltd. .. Appellant v/s. 1. The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 4(3), Mumbai & anr... Respondents Mr.M.Subramanian i/by Mr.V.S.Hadade for appellant. CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED:18thAugust, 2004 P.C. Heard Mr.M.Subramanian, the learned counsel for the assessee-appellant. 2. The Tribunal considered the matter thus- "7. In the present case though theidentity of the creditor is established,there are insufficient facts to establishthe creditworthiness of the creditor. Itis obligatory upon the assessee to furnishthe sufficient material to establish thecreditworthiness of the creditor. Thebooks of accounts were not produced by thecreditor. It was not shown that how thecreditor was in the position to advance thesum of Rs.6,50,000/-. The books ofaccounts were not produced by the creditoron the ground that the books were stolen.No evidence or material was produced tosubstantiate that the books of the creditorwere stolen. Even bank account of thecreditor was not produced at any stage.The transactions relating to purchases alsodo not support the financialcreditworthiness of the creditor andgenuineness of the transaction in absenceof any other supporting material. Theassessee had made the purchases from thecreditor for which the payments were madewithin a span of about three months. Theamount of Rs.6,50,000/- which was obtainedby the assessee from creditor in the monthof April remained untouch for whole of theyear. No explanation has been furnished substantial question of law arises. Appeal is dismissed in limine. (R.M.LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan