Itxa/3498/2009 Of The Commissioner Dof Income-Tax-Tds v. M/S Tata Tea Ltd
High Court
15 Oct 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3498/2009 Of The Commissioner Dof Income-Tax-Tds v. M/S Tata Tea Ltd
Date of order
15 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/3498/2009 Of The Commissioner Dof Income-Tax-Tds v. M/S Tata Tea Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 499 OF 2005.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes,Office :
Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances,Court ’s :
orders or directions & :
Prothonotary’s orders. :
------------------------------------------------------------
Mr P. S. Sahadevan, Advocate for the
Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008.
DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008.
DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard learned counsel for the
Appellant.
2. The learned counsel for the
Appellant contends that as the tax effect is
less than Rs.4,00,000/-, he seeks leave to
withdraw the above appeal. The appeal is
allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
3. Proper court fee be refunded in the
above appeal as per rules.
(V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.