Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/3498/2009 Of The Commissioner Dof I...

Itxa/3498/2009 Of The Commissioner Dof Income-Tax-Tds v. M/S Tata Tea Ltd

High Court 15 Oct 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3498/2009 Of The Commissioner Dof Income-Tax-Tds v. M/S Tata Tea Ltd
Date of order
15 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/3498/2009 Of The Commissioner Dof Income-Tax-Tds v. M/S Tata Tea Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 499 OF 2005. ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearances,Court ’s : orders or directions & : Prothonotary’s orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Mr P. S. Sahadevan, Advocate for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008. DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008. DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. 2. The learned counsel for the Appellant contends that as the tax effect is less than Rs.4,00,000/-, he seeks leave to withdraw the above appeal. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. 3. Proper court fee be refunded in the above appeal as per rules. (V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan