Itxa/351/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Xxiv v. H.y.samat
High Court
17 Jan 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/351/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Xxiv v. H.y.samat
Date of order
17 Jan 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/351/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Xxiv v. H.y.samat, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Commissioner ofIncome Tax reported in 249 I.T.R.265 (Bom.) In view Income Tax thereof, the appeal stands dismissed. .
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.351 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.351 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri H.Y. Samant ..Respondent.
Mr.Pankaj Kapoor for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 17TH JANUARY, 2005.
CORAM : S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 17TH JANUARY, 2005.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
Perused the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
dated 26/4/2002. The issue involved in the above appeal
is covered by the Judgment of this Court in the case of
Cadell Weaving Mill Co.P.Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of
Cadell Weaving Mill Co.P.Ltd. V/s. Commissioner ofIncome Tax reported in 249 I.T.R.265 (Bom.) In view
Income Tax
thereof, the appeal stands dismissed.
. Learned counsel for the appellant states that
the issue is now pending in the Supreme Court.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue