Itxa/3518/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Shanudeep Ltd
High Court
07 May 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3518/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Shanudeep Ltd
Date of order
07 May 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/3518/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Shanudeep Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal, is therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1710 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income-
tax-3, Mumbai ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Shanudeep Limited ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.
Ms.Vasanti B. Patel for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 7TH MAY, 2009.
P.C. :
1. Both parties agree that the issue sought to
be raised in this appeal is concluded in assessee’s
own case for assessment year vide order dated
4-3-2009 in Income Tax Appeal No.151 of 2009.
2. In this view of the matter, no substantial
question of law is involved in this appeal. The
appeal, is therefore, dismissed with no order as to
costs.
(V.C. Daga, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue