Itxa/35/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-Ii v. Smt. Manju R. Gupta
High Court
24 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/35/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-Ii v. Smt. Manju R. Gupta
Date of order
24 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/35/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-Ii v. Smt. Manju R. Gupta, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
wadhwa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.35 OF 2013
Commissioner of Income Tax,Central-II..Appellant
-Versus-Smt. Manju R. Gupta..Respondent
...........
Mr. Mr. A. R. Malhotra a/w N. A. Kazi i/b. Ms. Padma Divakar for the Appellant.
Mr. J. D. Mistri, Senior Advocate, a/w P. C. Tripathi i/b. Atul Jasani for the Respondent.
...........
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE :- 24[th] DECEMBER, 2014
P.C.:
The three questions in this Appeal are identical to the questions raised and dealt with by us in Income Tax Appeal No.173/13. The Assessee is also the same. Since the controversy and question is identical and in relation to the same Assessee, for the reasons indicated in our order in that Appeal, this Appeal also fails. It is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs.
(A. A. SAYED, J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue