Itxa/3529/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4,Mum v. M/S Ronak Manharlal Sheth
High Court
07 May 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3529/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4,Mum v. M/S Ronak Manharlal Sheth
Date of order
07 May 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/3529/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4,Mum v. M/S Ronak Manharlal Sheth, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal, is therefore, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1978 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income-
tax - 4, Mumbai ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Ronak Manharlal Sheth ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 7TH MAY, 2009.
P.C. :
1. The learned counsel for the revenue fairly
states that the issue sought to be raised in this
appeal is squarely covered by the Division Bench
judgment of this court in the case of CIT V/s.
Walfort Share and Stock Brokers P. Limited
reported in [2009] 310 I.T.R. 421.
2. In this view of the matter, we see no
question of law in this appeal. The appeal, is
therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs.
(V.C. Daga, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue