Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/355/2016 Of M/S Rocket Engineering...

Itxa/355/2016 Of M/S Rocket Engineering Corporation (P) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I,Kolhapur

High Court 26 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/355/2016 Of M/S Rocket Engineering Corporation (P) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I,Kolhapur
Date of order
26 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/355/2016 Of M/S Rocket Engineering Corporation (P) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I,Kolhapur, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.With these observations, tax appeal is disposed of as notpressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Priya Soparkar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.355 OF 2016 M/s Rocket Engineering Corporation (P) Ltd.… Appellant V/s. The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Kolhapur.… Respondent --- Mr.Ashok Gade for the Appellant.Mr.P.C.Chhotaray i/by Mr.N.N.Singh for the Respondent. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 26, 2018. P.C.:- 1.This appeal is filed by the assessee challenging the orderdated 12[th] January, 2015 passed by the income Tax AppellateTribunal rejecting its application under Section 254(2) of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 seeking rectification of the main judgmentof the Tribunal. Learned counsel for the Appellant was consciousof the fact that by virtue of the judgment of this court, the presenttax appeal would not be maintainable. His option would be tofile Writ Petition instead. The learned counsel however 23 itxa 355-16-o submitted that, instead of pursuing the challenge to therectification order of the Tribunal, the assessee would like tofocus on challenge to the original order of the Tribunal itself. Forsuch purpose, he proposes to file independent tax appeal. Hewould, therefore, not press the present tax appeal. His anxietythat the proposed tax appeal, may be considered delayed, canbe addressed as and when such tax appeal is filed alongwithapplication for condonation of delay. We are conscious that thepresent tax appeal was filed on or around 15[th] June, 2015 andsince then the assessee is bonafide pursuing this appeal. Thiswould of-course be one of the considerations when we wouldexamine the element of delay in challenging the judgment ofthe Tribunal. 2.With these observations, tax appeal is disposed of as notpressed. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.)….
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan