In Itxa/358/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 28 v. Nitin Ramchandra Tandel, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 358 OF 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax-28
.. Appellant
v/s.
Shri. Nitin Ramchandra Tandl
..Respondent
None for the appellant
Mr. Tanmay Phadke a/w Mr. Satendra Pandey for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 9[th] AUGUST, 2018.
1.When this appeal was called out earlier, none appeared in
support of the appeal. Therefore, the appeal was kept back. On beingcalled the second time also none appeared in support of the appeal.
2.It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting thepresent appeal.
3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Digitallysigned byUdayUday ShivajiJagtapShivajiDate:2018.08.13Jagtap10:53:48+0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue