Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/3583/2009 Of The Director Income Ta...

Itxa/3583/2009 Of The Director Income Tax E v. Plast India Foundation

High Court 16 Nov 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3583/2009 Of The Director Income Tax E v. Plast India Foundation
Date of order
16 Nov 2010
Assessment year(s)
1990-91
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/3583/2009 Of The Director Income Tax E v. Plast India Foundation, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 5In these circumstance, we see no merit in the present Appeal and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [J P DEVADHAR, J]

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

lgc 1 ITXA NO.3583/09. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3583 OF 2009 The Director Income Tax (E)versus : Appellant. Plast India Foundation : Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Ms. Aasifa Khan for the Respondent. CORAM :J P DEVADHAR AND R M SAVANT, JJ.DATED :16[th] NOVEMBER 2010 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the Appeal. 2Following question of law is raised by the Revenue in this Appeal :- “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble ITAT was right in upholding the impugned order of Ld. CIT(A) directing the Assessing Officer to allow exemption u/s. 11 to the assessee in view of the provisions of section 11(4A) ?” 3 3On perusal of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, it is seen that the Assessing Officer himself has allowed similar claim of the Assessee in the subsequent assessment year and the counsel for the revenue fairly states that no appeal under section 260A of the Act has been filed by the revenue against the order of ITAT in those assessment years. No plausible reason is given for not filing appeal in those assessment years and why appeal is sought to be filed in the assessment year in question. 2 ITXA NO.3583/09. 4So far as the order of ITAT for Assessment Year 1990-91 is concerned, which is relied upon by the Tribunal in the present case, it appears that the Revenue has accepted the decision of the Tribunal. 5In these circumstance, we see no merit in the present Appeal and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [J P DEVADHAR, J]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan