Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/3632/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/3632/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Vi Mumbai v. Esjay International P Ltd

High Court 22 Nov 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3632/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Vi Mumbai v. Esjay International P Ltd
Date of order
22 Nov 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/3632/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Vi Mumbai v. Esjay International P Ltd, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Issue: The appeal is admitted on the following question of law:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that Duty drawback of Rs.2.51 crores and other export incentives of Rs.9.54 lac are eligible for deduction u/s.80IA of the Act, even thou...

Decision: The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3632 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Esjay International P. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta with Ms. Padma Divakar for appellant.Mr. A.K. Jasani for respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C. :- 1.Heard learned counsel for the parties. The appeal is admitted on the following question of law:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that Duty drawback of Rs.2.51 crores and other export incentives of Rs.9.54 lac are eligible for deduction u/s.80IA of the Act, even though the same are not in the nature of income derived from industrial undertakings ? " Counsel on both sides state that the aforesaid question is answered by an earlier decision of the Apex Court in the case of Liberty India V/s. CIT reported in (2009) 317 ITR 218 (SC). In the light of the aforesaid decision of the Apex Court, the question raised in this appeal is answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. (R.M. SAVANT, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan