Itxa/3658/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iv,Pune v. Pandurang Sah.kari Sakhar Karkhan Ltd
High Court
07 May 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3658/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iv,Pune v. Pandurang Sah.kari Sakhar Karkhan Ltd
Date of order
07 May 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/3658/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iv,Pune v. Pandurang Sah.kari Sakhar Karkhan Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals, are therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1808 OF 2007
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1809 OF 2007
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1810 OF 2007
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1811 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income-
tax - IV, Pune ..Appellant.
V/s.
Pandurang S.S.K. Limited ..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the
appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 7TH MAY, 2009.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The
questions of law sought to be raised in these
appeals are covered by the Judgment of this Court
in the case of CIT V/s. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari
Sakhar Karkhana Limited reported in 301 ITR 191
(Bom).
2. In this view of the matter, no substantial
question of law is involved in these appeals.
Apart from this, the issue is revolving around the
findings of fact recorded by the tribunal.
3. The appeals, are therefore, dismissed with
no order as to costs.
(V.C. Daga, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.