Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/366/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/366/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-Ii Mumbai v. Satate Bank Of India

High Court 18 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/366/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-Ii Mumbai v. Satate Bank Of India
Date of order
18 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/366/2002 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, City-Ii Mumbai v. Satate Bank Of India, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 366 OF 2002 The Commissioner of Income tax,Mumbai City-II, Mumbaiv/s.M/s. State Bank of IndiaMr.K.R.Chaudhary with Mr.Vijay Kantharia i/byMr.H.D.Rathod for appellant. .. appellant .. Respondent P.C. Heard. CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED:18thAugust, 2004 2. No substantial question of law arises.Dismissed in limine. (R.M.LODHA, J.)(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan