Itxa/3708/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Ix, Bombay v. Impaect Containers Ltd
High Court
22 Nov 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3708/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Ix, Bombay v. Impaect Containers Ltd
Date of order
22 Nov 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/3708/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Ix, Bombay v. Impaect Containers Ltd, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD.) NO.112 OF 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD.) NO.112 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Impaect Container Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S.Rao for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2005.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Mr.Rao appearing for the appellant states that the question sought to be raised in this appeal is decided against the appellant. He, therefore, does not press this appeal. Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
(H.L.GOKHALE, J.)
(H.L.GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue