Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/371/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/371/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 Mumbai v. Devidayal Slaes Ltd

High Court 20 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/371/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 Mumbai v. Devidayal Slaes Ltd
Date of order
20 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/371/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -6 Mumbai v. Devidayal Slaes Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: M/s.Oman International Bank SAOG] (unreported).3.Appeal is dismissed in limine with noorder as to costs. for the (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA J.)

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 371 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income-tax-6,Mumbai.V/s.Devidayal (Sales) Limited. ... Appellant.... Respondent. Suresh Kumar for the appellant. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 20th April 2009.P.C. :----.Heard. 2.Learned counsel appearingappellant- Revenue fairly states that the questionrelating to bad debts, which is sought to be raisedin this appeal, is covered by the judgment of thisCourt in I.T.Appeal No.114/2009 decided on 9thFebruary, 2009 [Director of Income Tax (Intentional)v. M/s.Oman International Bank SAOG] (unreported).3.Appeal is dismissed in limine with noorder as to costs. for the (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan