Itxa/3713/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Ix, Bombay v. Special Steels Ltd
High Court
28 Nov 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3713/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Ix, Bombay v. Special Steels Ltd
Date of order
28 Nov 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/3713/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Ix, Bombay v. Special Steels Ltd, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.136 OF 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.136 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Special Steels Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.S.Rao for appellant.
CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND
CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 28TH NOVEMBER, 2005.
DATED : 28TH NOVEMBER, 2005.
DATED : 28TH NOVEMBER, 2005.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Mr.Rao appearing for the appellant states
that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is
covered against the appellant. He, therefore, does not
press this appeal. Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
(H.L.GOKHALE, J.)
(H.L.GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue