Itxa/3714/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-X,Bombay v. Cmc Ltd
High Court
13 Dec 2005 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3714/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-X,Bombay v. Cmc Ltd
Date of order
13 Dec 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/3714/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-X,Bombay v. Cmc Ltd, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to raise this issue before the Tribunal by making necessary application.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Income Tax Appeal (L) No.140 of 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax ... Appellant
v/s.
M/s.CMC Ltd. ... Respondent
Mr.Ashok Kontangale for appellant.
None for respondent.
----
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 13th December 2005
P.C. :
1. Mr.Kontangale appearing for the appellant
states that the appellant may move a Miscellaneous
Application for the review of the impugned order
since the appellant would like to canvass that
more than 50% of the shares of the concerned
Company are not held by the Company. The Tribunal
will consider the submissions as and when any such
Application is made.
2. Mr.Kontangale, therefore, withdraws this
Appeal. Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with
liberty to raise this issue before the Tribunal by
making necessary application.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
-2-
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.