In Itxa/372/2009 Of The Commissione Rof Incometax-Iii,Thane v. Smt Neelom A Bijlani, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed aswithdrawn with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 372 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-III,Mumbai.
Mumbai.... Appellant.V/s.Smt.Neelam A. Bijlani.... Respondent.
S.K.Bhatnagar with N.P.Prajapati for the appellant.
V.S.Hadade for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 20th April 2009.
P.C. :----.Since the tax effect involved in thisappeal is less than Rs.4 lakh, learned counsel forthe appellant- Revenue seeks permission to withdrawthis appeal. Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed aswithdrawn with no order as to costs.
2.Needless to mention that the appellant is
entitled to refund of court fee as per law.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue