In Itxa/3725/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11, Mumbai v. Mrs. Manek B. Cooper, Mumbai, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, for the reasons recorded therein, the present appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3725 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Mrs. Manek B. Cooper
..Respondent.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr. P.C. Tripathi for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND R.M. SAVANT, JJ.
DATED : 15TH NOVEMBER, 2010
P.C. :-
1.Counsel on both sides agree that similar question raised in the case of the assessee and his brother have been dismissed by this Court on 30[th] July, 2009 in Income Tax Appeal No.600 of 2007 [The Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Mrs. Manek B. Cooper] and Income Tax Appeal No.1553 of 2007 [The Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Mr. Roosi K. Modi]. In this view of the matter, for the reasons recorded therein, the present appeal is also dismissed.
(R.M. SAVANT, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue