Itxa/3745/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii ,Pune v. Shree Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd
High Court
07 May 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3745/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii ,Pune v. Shree Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd
Date of order
07 May 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/3745/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii ,Pune v. Shree Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal, is therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2076 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income-
Tax - III, Pune ..Appellant.
V/s.
Shree Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar
Karkhana Limited ..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Mr.R.C. Tripathi i/by S.N. Inamdar for the
respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 7TH MAY, 2009.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The
questions of law sought to be raised in this appeal
is covered by the Judgment of this Court in the
case of CIT V/s. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar
Karkhana Limited reported in 301 ITR 191 (Bom).
2. In this view of the matter, no substantial
question of law is involved in thus appeal. Apart
from this, the issue is revolving around the
findings of fact recorded by the tribunal.
3. The appeal, is therefore, dismissed with no
order as to costs.
(V.C. Daga, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.