Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/3745/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/3745/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii ,Pune v. Shree Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd

High Court 07 May 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3745/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii ,Pune v. Shree Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd
Date of order
07 May 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/3745/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii ,Pune v. Shree Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal, is therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2076 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income- Tax - III, Pune ..Appellant. V/s. Shree Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant. Mr.R.C. Tripathi i/by S.N. Inamdar for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 7TH MAY, 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The questions of law sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the Judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited reported in 301 ITR 191 (Bom). 2. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in thus appeal. Apart from this, the issue is revolving around the findings of fact recorded by the tribunal. 3. The appeal, is therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. (V.C. Daga, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan