In Itxa/3775/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Vi Mumbai v. Esjay Internationer P Ltd, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Issue: The appeal is admitted on the following question of law:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that Excise Duty Draw Back amounting to Rs.2.34 crores is eligible for deduction u/s.80IB of the Act, even though the same is not in the...
Decision: The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3775 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-VI
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Esjay International P. Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta with Ms. Padma Divakar for appellant.Mr. A.K. Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND R.M. SAVANT, JJ.
DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2010
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the parties. The appeal is admitted on the following question of law:-
" Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that Excise Duty Draw Back amounting to Rs.2.34 crores is eligible for deduction u/s.80IB of the Act, even though the same is not in the nature of income derived from industrial undertakings ? "
Counsel on both sides state that the aforesaid question is
answered by an earlier decision of the Apex Court in the case of Liberty India V/s. CIT reported in (2009) 317 ITR 218 (SC). In the light of the aforesaid decision of the Apex Court, the question raised in this appeal is answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
(R.M. SAVANT, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.