Case Law › High Court › Itxa/3802/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/3802/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S Tridoss Laboratoris Ltd

High Court 26 Feb 2007 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

26 Feb 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/3802/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S Tridoss Laboratoris Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.499 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income-tax Central-I, Mumbai .. Appellant. V/s. M/s.Tridoss Lab. Limited .. Respondent. Mr.B.M. Chatterjee with Mrs.P.P. Bhosale for the Appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 26TH FEBRUARY, 2007. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Perused the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. It appears that for earlier assessment years, the Tribunal had remanded the matter back to the CIT (A). On the same ground, even for the present year, the matter has been remanded to the CIT (A). 3. In view thereof, there is no substantial question of law involved in this appeal. The appeal stands dismissed. (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) 2 (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.