Itxa/38/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Taxcentral-Iii v. M/S Mohan Hotels Pvt.ltd
High Court
16 Oct 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/38/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Taxcentral-Iii v. M/S Mohan Hotels Pvt.ltd
Date of order
16 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/38/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Taxcentral-Iii v. M/S Mohan Hotels Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.38 OF 2005
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.38 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Mohan Hotels Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Considering the facts on record, the
Tribunal came to the conclusion that regarding the
eligibility for set off of loss incurred in the present
year is to be determined by the assessing officer
having jurisdiction over the year in which the set off
is claimed. In that context, the Tribunal observed
that the observation made by the assessing officer and
the CIT (A) in the orders impugned are, therefore,
infructuous and accordingly the appeal was dismissed as
infructuous. Considering the above, the question of
law as formulated in para 5 of the appeal memo, does
not arise. Hence appeal is dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.