Case Law › High Court › Itxa/383/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/383/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Viii, Mumbai v. M/S Delhi Boattling Co. Pvt.ltd

High Court 06 Dec 2005 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

06 Dec 2005

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/383/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Viii, Mumbai v. M/S Delhi Boattling Co. Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.383 OF 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.383 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income-Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Delhi Bottling Co.P.Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.A.S.Rao for appellant. Mr.F.V.Irani i/b.Atul Jasani for respondent. CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 6TH DECEMBER, 2005. CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 6TH DECEMBER, 2005. P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard Mr.Rao in suport of this appeal. Mr. Irani appears for the respondent. Counsel for the revenue could not show that the order of the Tribunal passed in the earlier years have not obtained finality. On this footing, Income Tax Appeal No.90 of 2004 for the earlier year was dismissed. The present appeal is concerning the assessment period 1987-88. Appeal is dismissed. (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.