Itxa/3840/2010 Of The Comissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S Sainara Properties Pvt.ltd
High Court
06 Mar 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3840/2010 Of The Comissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S Sainara Properties Pvt.ltd
Date of order
06 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/3840/2010 Of The Comissioner Of Income-Tax,City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S Sainara Properties Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view thereof, as the tax effect is less than Rs.2 lakhs, the present appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.746 OF 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.746 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Sainara Properties Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.Kotangale with P.S. Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.J.D. Mistry with R. Darab for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant
and the respondent. Perused the order of the ITAT
dated 30th December, 2002. It pertains to the
assessment year 1998-99. In the above appeal, the tax
effect is only to the extent of Rs.50,400/- and the
Tribunal has relied upon the Judgment of this Court
reported in Commissioner of Income-Tax V/s. Camco
Commissioner of Income-Tax V/s. CamcoColour Co. reported in 254 ITR 565 (Bom.) and as the
Colour Co.
tax effect is less than Rs.2 lakhs, therefore,
dismissed the appeal. In view thereof, as the tax
effect is less than Rs.2 lakhs, the present appeal
stands dismissed.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.