Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/3841/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/3841/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds Mumbai v. Shemarro Video Pvt. Ltd

High Court 22 Nov 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3841/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds Mumbai v. Shemarro Video Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
22 Nov 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/3841/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds Mumbai v. Shemarro Video Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3841 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Shemaroo Video Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant.None for respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C. :- 1.The only question of law framed by the Revenue against the order of the Tribunal dated 05/05/2009 reads as under:- “ Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the payments made by the assessee to various replicators / manufacturers where the principle object of the assessee was to get the material / feature film imprinted in the VCD / DVD format as per prescribed specifications and under control of the assessee was for sale of goods and not for carrying out a work for the purpose of Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ? “ 2.Counsel for the revenue fairly states that the aforesaid question of law is answered by this Court in favour of the assessee in the case of CIT V/s. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. reported in [2010] 191 Taxman 455 (Bom). For the reasons recorded in the aforesaid judgment, the question is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. (R.M. SAVANT, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan