In Itxa/386/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-9, Mumbai v. Elel Hotel And Investments Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 386 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-9Mumbai
v/s.
Elel Hotels and Investments Ltd.
.. Appellant
..Respondent
None for the appellant
Mr. Atul Jasani for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 18[th] JULY, 2018.
1.When this appeal was called out earlier, none appeared insupport of the appeal. Therefore, the appeal was kept back. On beingcalled the second time also none appeared in support of the appeal.
2.It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the
present appeal. This is more particularly so as the parties andadvocates were put to notice on 6[th] June, 2018 that this appeal wouldbe taken up for consideration today.
3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SANDcEEP K. SHINDE J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.