In Itxa/388/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S Cello Home Products, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons recorded in the said order dated 31st March, 2009, appeal is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 388 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax,Central-III, Mumbai.
V/s.
M/s.Cello Home Products.
... Appellant.
... Respondent.
Ms.Anamika Malhotra for the appellant.
P.C.Tripathi for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 20th April 2009.
P.C. :----
.Heard learned counsel for the rival
parties. Perused appeal.
This Court found no merit in the said question, with
the result, appeal was dismissed.
3.
For the reasons recorded in the said order
dated 31st March, 2009, appeal is dismissed in limine
with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue