Itxa/3898/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 ,Mumbai v. M/S Videocon Leasing And Industrial Finance Ltd
High Court
23 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3898/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 ,Mumbai v. M/S Videocon Leasing And Industrial Finance Ltd
Date of order
23 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/3898/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 ,Mumbai v. M/S Videocon Leasing And Industrial Finance Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3633/2007 IN IRXA (L) NO.6/2007
(The CIT Mumbai V/s.M/s.Videocon Leasing & Industries Finance Ltd.)
____________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memo- ¦
-randa of Coram, Apperances¦ Court’s or Judges Orders
Courts orders or directions¦
and Prothonotary’s orders ¦
--------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA, JJ. DATE23rd April, 2008P.C.:
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
: DATE23rd April, 2008
: DATE
: DATE
P.C.:
. Heard Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant &
Ms.Neeta Rajda i/by DSR Associates for
Respondent. By this Notice of Motion, the
Appellant is seeking condonation of 321
days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. It
appears that though the Chief Commissioner
of Income Tax had granted approval for
filing an Appeal on 23.8.2006 the Appeal
came to be filed belatedly on 31.7.2007.
The reasons given for delay that of getting
the draft memo of Appeal prepared and
non-availability of Court fee stamps etc.
does not appear to be justifiable. No
sufficient cause is made out for condonation
of delay. Hence, Notice of Motion stands
dismissed.
2. In view of dismissal of the Notice of
Motion, Interest Tax Appeal (L) No.6/2007
also stands dismissed.
(SANTOSH BORA J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SANTOSH BORA J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.