Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/3900/2009 Of The Commissionser Of I...

Itxa/3900/2009 Of The Commissionser Of Income Tax -3 Mumbai v. M/S. Vinyl Chemicals Ltd

High Court 22 Nov 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3900/2009 Of The Commissionser Of Income Tax -3 Mumbai v. M/S. Vinyl Chemicals Ltd
Date of order
22 Nov 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/3900/2009 Of The Commissionser Of Income Tax -3 Mumbai v. M/S. Vinyl Chemicals Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The question raised by the revenue in this appeal against the order of the Tribunal dated 12/08/2008 reads as under:- “ Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was right in holding that as regard deduction U/s.80I, the ITAT has held that late payment charges re...

Decision: For the reasons recorded in the aforesaid judgment, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3900 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3 ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Vinyl Chemicals (I) Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant. Mr. Jas Sangvhi i/b. PDS Legal for respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C. :- 1.Heard. The question raised by the revenue in this appeal against the order of the Tribunal dated 12/08/2008 reads as under:- “ Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was right in holding that as regard deduction U/s.80I, the ITAT has held that late payment charges received from the debtors relate to sales effected by the assessee and the same is to be treated as business receipts while computing deduction u/s. 80 I of the Act ? “ Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that the aforesaid question is answered against the revenue in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax V/s. Vidyut Corporation reported in [2010] 324 ITR 221 (Bom). For the reasons recorded in the aforesaid judgment, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (R.M. SAVANT, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan