Itxa/391/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax7 v. Namrata Exports Pvt Ltd
High Court
11 Jan 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/391/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax7 v. Namrata Exports Pvt Ltd
Date of order
11 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/391/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax7 v. Namrata Exports Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.391 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Namrata Exports Pvt. Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 11TH JANUARY, 2010
P.C. :-
1.Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the revenue placed on record a copy of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court on 28[th ]July, 2009 in the case of the Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Namrata Exports Pvt.Ltd. (Income Tax Appeal No.1117 of 2004 with connected matter Income Tax Appeal No.384 of 2005). Those appeals involved the same question and were dismissed with the following observation:-
“ Admittedly, the addition in the hands of Mr.S.M.Khandhar by the Tribunal has become final and conclusive. In this view of the matter, there cannot be additional addition in the hands of present respondent. The view taken by the Tribunal in this regard on the similar lines indicated herein cannot be faulted. In this view of the matter, both the appeals stand dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs. “
Learned counsel for the revenue fairly stated that the present
appeal would be covered by the judgment in the earlier case. Even otherwise, we are of the view that in view of the finding of the Tribunal in paragraph 4 of the judgment, namely, that the amount has been brought to tax in the hands of Shri S.M. Khandhar, nothing further would survive in this appeal, which accordingly does not raise any substantial question of law. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.