Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/3949/2009 Of The Director Of Income...

Itxa/3949/2009 Of The Director Of Income-Tax(International Taxation) v. M/S Mckinsey And Co Inc. (Norway)

High Court 23 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/3949/2009 Of The Director Of Income-Tax(International Taxation) v. M/S Mckinsey And Co Inc. (Norway)
Date of order
23 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/3949/2009 Of The Director Of Income-Tax(International Taxation) v. M/S Mckinsey And Co Inc. (Norway), the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1174/2008 IN ITXA (L) NO.699/2008 (Director of Income Tax V/s.M/s.Mckinsey & Co.Inc.Norway ____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memo- ¦ -randa of Coram, Apperances¦ Court’s or Judges Orders Courts orders or directions¦ and Prothonotary’s orders ¦ -------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SANTOSH BORA, JJ. DATE23rd April, 2008P.C.: SANTOSH BORA, JJ. : DATE23rd April, 2008 : DATE : DATE P.C.: . Heard Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant & Mr.Jitendra Jain for Respondent. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 699 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. It appears that the last date for filing an Appeal was 5.4.2006, however the Appeal came to be filed belatedly on 5.3.2008. The reasons given for delay that of restructuring of the Directorate of International Taxation & substantial amount of workload etc. does not appear to be justifiable. No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice of Motion stands dismissed. 2. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income Tax Appeal (L) No.699/2008 also stands dismissed. (SANTOSH BORA J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (SANTOSH BORA J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan