Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/395/2004 Of M/S Mahin Ra And Mahind...

Itxa/395/2004 Of M/S Mahin Ra And Mahindra Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income- Tax,City-Ii,Mumbai

High Court 12 Dec 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/395/2004 Of M/S Mahin Ra And Mahindra Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income- Tax,City-Ii,Mumbai
Date of order
12 Dec 2005
Assessment year(s)
1990-91
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/395/2004 Of M/S Mahin Ra And Mahindra Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income- Tax,City-Ii,Mumbai, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Decision: We allow the appeal at the stage of admission itself.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

-= : 1 : =- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.395 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.395 OF 2004 M/s.Mahaindra & Mahindra Ltd. ..Appellant. V/s. Commissioner of Income-tax ..Respondent. Mr.J.I.Patel i/b.B.V.Jhaveri for appellant. Mr.Ashok Kotangale for respondent. CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 12TH DECEMBER, 2005. DATED : 12TH DECEMBER, 2005. P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. 2. Mr.Ashok Kotangale waives service for the respondent. 3. Heard finally with the consent of the parties. 4. The order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal confirming the appeal in Appeal No.3058/1996 for the assessment year 1990-91 is under challenge in the present appeal. We find from the impugned order -= : 2 : =- that in fact no reasons are given for coming to the conclusion in passing the order under section 163 of the Income Tax Act making the assessee, an agent of a non resident and imposing the liability on the assessee. It is only for this reason, we allow this appeal concerning the assessment year 1990-91 in Appeal No.3058/1996 and set aside that order and restore the appeal to the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to be decided after hearing both the parties and after giving reasons in support of that order. 5. We allow the appeal at the stage of admission itself. Rule is made absolute in terms of the order with no order as to costs. 6. All rival contentions are kept open. (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan