In Itxa/396/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 7, Mumbai v. M/S Sunita Pipes Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: DATED : 11TH JANUARY, 2011 P.C. :- 1.A short question raised in this appeal is, whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the additions made in the hands of the assessee when in fact the very same amount has been offered to tax and accepted in the hands of two Directors i.e A.K.
Decision: In this view of the matter, we see no merit in the appeal and hence the same is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.396 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-7..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Sunita Pipes Pvt...Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED : 11TH JANUARY, 2011
P.C. :-
1.A short question raised in this appeal is, whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the additions made in the hands of the assessee when in fact the very same amount has been offered to tax and accepted in the hands of two Directors i.e A.K. Bhatia and R.K. Bhatia. It is not disputed that the amount sought to be taxed in the hands of the assessee has already been taxed in the hands of A.K. Bhatia and R.K. Bhatia and the said order has attained finaility. In this view of the matter, we see no merit in the appeal and hence the same is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.