In Itxa/3971/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai-12 v. M/S Kala Niketan, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The Income Tax Appeal stands dismissed accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.552 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Incoem-tax,
Mumbai City XII .. Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Kala Niketan .. Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Rao for the appellant.
Mr.B.V. Jhaveri for the respondent.
CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 26TH FEBRUARY, 2007.
P.C. :
1. In view of dismissal of the notice of motion
seeking condonation of delay, the Income Tax Appeal
does not survive.
2. The Income Tax Appeal stands dismissed
accordingly.
(DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue