Case Law › High Court › Itxa/4002/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/4002/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.vitessee Trading Co. Ltd

High Court 10 Apr 2007 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

10 Apr 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/4002/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.vitessee Trading Co. Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the Tax effect is less than Rs.4,00,000/-, weare not inclined to entertain the above Appeal.Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1122 OF 2003 The Commisioner of Income Tax..AppellantVs.M/s.Vitessee Trading Co. Ltd...RespondentNone for the parties. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 10TH APRIL, 2007P.C..In view of the Circular issued by theGovernment of India, Ministry of Finance, Departmentof Revenue, CBDT, dated 24th October,2005, themonetary limit is fixed at Rs.4,00,000/- with regardto the Appeal under Section 260 A of the Income TaxAct. As the Tax effect is less than Rs.4,00,000/-, weare not inclined to entertain the above Appeal.Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.