In Itxa/401/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-13,Mum v. Shri Prakashkumar S. Pandya, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.401 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax-13 ..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Prakashkumar S. Pandya ..Respondent.
Mr.Cazi for the Appellant.
Ms.Vasanti B. Patil for the Respondent.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2008.
P.C. :
1. The question of law as framed does not
arise from the order of the tribunal. The order of
the tribunal turns really on the findings of fact
recorded by it after appreciation of evidence on
record. The appeal cannot be entertained. Hence,
rejected.
D.K. DESHMUKH, J.
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue