In Itxa/401/2017 Of Hemant Shivaji Sanap v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (A)-Ii Nashik And Anr, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is,therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
SKN
1/1401.17-itxa.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 401 OF 2017
Shri Hemant Shivaji Sanap.…Appellant.V/s.Commissioner of Income Tax(A)-II, Nashikand another.…Respondents.
Mr.Ashok T. Gade for the appellant.None for the respondents.
CORAM :AKIL KURESHI AND S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.DATE :1st July 2019.
P.C.:
This appeal is filed by the assessee. The learned counselappearing for the appellant stated that despite repeated communicationsthe assessee has failed to provide him necessary instructions. Appeal is,therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue