Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/40/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Itxa/40/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S Guruvas Textiles Ltd

High Court 26 Feb 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/40/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S Guruvas Textiles Ltd
Date of order
26 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
1992-93
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/40/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S Guruvas Textiles Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The order of the Tribunal was confirmed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.40 OF 2004 The CIT Mumbai City-3 ..Appellant V/s. M/s.Guruvas Textiles Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.J.D.Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 26.02.2008. PC 1. Commissioner (Appeals) by his order dated 26.12.1995 considered two contentions advanced by the assessees who were the appellants before him. The first question was regarding disallowance made out of interest payment to the City Bank of Rs.2,48,405/-. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that disallowance are the same as discussed in the case of sister concerns of the assessee M/s.Lazor Sintex Ltd., for the assessment year 1992-93 which has been decided by the appellate order dated 22.12.1992. Commissioner (Appeals) relied on the same order, deleted disallowance of Rs.2,48,405/-. 2. In so far as disallowance of Rs.53,96,854/- being the claim of loss on sale of debentures, held : 2 : against the assessee and maintained the dis-allowance. 3. The assessee aggrieved, preferred an appeal before ITAT. ITAT while disposing off the appeal in so far as debentures are concerned, by its order dated 18.10.2002 relied on the judgment in the case of M/s.Lazor Syntex Limited allowed the appeal in favour of the assessee. From the order of the Tribunal it is also found that the Tribunal has also framed another question viz. disallowance of the interest payable to the City Bank. We may note here that the appellant before the Tribunal was the assessee. The said question was allowed in favour of the assessee by the Commissioner (Appeals). That was not the issue raised before the Commissioner and consequently that was not the issue. Once that being the case, the question-(b) of paragraph-5 as framed would not arise. In so far as question-(a) is concerned, the judgment in M/s.Lazor Syntex Ltd., had come up for consideration before this Court in Income Tax Application No.11 of 1999 in the case of CIT Vs.Lazor Syntex Limited. The order of the Tribunal was confirmed. That being the case, question-(a) also would not arise. Consequently, appeal dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan