Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/40/2005 Of M/S Maharashtra Hybrid S...

Itxa/40/2005 Of M/S Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Company Ltd v. The Income-Tax,Ofcer Ward 1(2) (1)

High Court 16 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/40/2005 Of M/S Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Company Ltd v. The Income-Tax,Ofcer Ward 1(2) (1)
Date of order
16 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/40/2005 Of M/S Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Company Ltd v. The Income-Tax,Ofcer Ward 1(2) (1), the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Issue: P.C. :- P.C. :- Admit, on the following questions of law :- "1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal erred in confirming the reduction of the notional expenditure on proportionate basis of Rs.20,51,527/- for arriving at the net dividend for the purposes of deductio...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.40 OF 2005 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.40 OF 2005 M/s. Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Co.Ltd. ..Appellant. V/s. The Income Tax Officer ..Respondent. M.K.B.Bhujle for appellant. Mr.A.S.Rao with P.S.Sahadevan for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- Admit, on the following questions of law :- "1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal erred in confirming the reduction of the notional expenditure on proportionate basis of Rs.20,51,527/- for arriving at the net dividend for the purposes of deduction under section 80M, contrary to the Judgment of this Court in C.I.T. V/s. Central Bank of India 264 I.T.R. 522 (Bom) ? 2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal erred un upholding the computation of the net dividend income at Rs.95,97,191/- for the purposes of deduction under section 80M, as made by the learned assessing officer as against the net dividend of Rs.1,16,48,718/- as computed by the learned C.I.T. (A) ? " Respondent waives service. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) - = : 2 : = -
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan