Itxa/402/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Dodsal Pvt. Ltd
High Court
20 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/402/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Dodsal Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
20 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/402/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-I, Mumbai v. M/S. Dodsal Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
AGK
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.402 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Central - I, Mumbai ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Dodsal Private Limited ..Respondents.
Mr.Sureshkumar for the appellant.
Ms.A. Vissanji i/by A.K. Jasani for the
respondents.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 20TH OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for both the sides.
2. Two questions are raised by the revenue
in this appeal. As regards first question is
concerned, the learned counsel for the revenue
states that the decision of the tribunal in the
case of assessee for earlier years has been
accepted by the revenue. In this view of the
matter, first question cannot be entertained.
3. In so far as second question is
concerned, the tribunal has only remanded the
matter for denovo consideration by allowing the
additional grounds raised by the assessee. In this
view of the matter, we see no merit in the appeal.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
D.K. DESHMUKH, J.
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.