In Itxa/402/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Jagadanand Investment And Trading Co Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed in limine with no order (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA J.)
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 402 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-3,Mumbai.V/s.M/s.Jagadanand Investment &Training Co.Pvt.Ltd.
... Appellant.
... Respondent.
Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
J.D.Mistry i/b. Raj Darak for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 20th April 2009.
P.C. :----.Heard learned counsel for the parties.2.In view of the fact that the impugned orderhas been recalled by the Tribunal, cause of action toproceed with this appeal does not survive. The
subsequent order passed by the Tribunal in the
impugned appeal is taken on record.
3.as to costs.
Appeal is dismissed in limine with no order
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue