Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/404/2008 Of Thecommissioner Of Inco...

Itxa/404/2008 Of Thecommissioner Of Income-Tax-12 v. Mr Shabbir S Sterwala

High Court 01 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/404/2008 Of Thecommissioner Of Income-Tax-12 v. Mr Shabbir S Sterwala
Date of order
01 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
1994-95
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/404/2008 Of Thecommissioner Of Income-Tax-12 v. Mr Shabbir S Sterwala, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.404 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-tax-12 ..Appellant. V/s. Shabbir S. Suterwala ..Respondent. Mr.P.A. Vora for the Appellant. Mr.A.K. Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2008. P.C. : 1. By consent of the parties the appeal is heard finally. 2. It is common ground that proviso to Section 148 which is inserted by Finance Act 206 of 2006 and which has been given retrospective effect is relevant. That provision has come into force admittedly after the order of the tribunal. In our opinion, therefore, it will be appropriate to remit the appeal back to the tribunal so that the proviso added by Finance Act 206 of 2006 to Section 148 can be considered by the Tribunal. 3. The order of the tribunal impugned in the present appeal is set aside. Appeal No.183/Mum/2003 for the assessment year 1994-95 is remitted back to the tribunal for denovo consideration and decision in accordance with law. 4. The appeal stands disposed of. D.K. DESHMUKH, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan