In Itxa/404/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 24 Mumbai v. Mr. Purshottam R. Ralkar, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 404 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax-24,Mumbai.
... Appellant.
V/s.
Mr.Purshottam R. Ralkar.
... Respondent.
R.Ashokan for the appellant.
Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 20th April 2009.
P.C. :----
.
Hear learned counsel for the rival parties.
Perused appeal.
is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to
costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue