Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/4051/2009 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/4051/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8, Mumbai v. M/S Winsell Electronics Ltd

High Court 22 Nov 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/4051/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8, Mumbai v. M/S Winsell Electronics Ltd
Date of order
22 Nov 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/4051/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8, Mumbai v. M/S Winsell Electronics Ltd, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C. :- 1.The question of law framed by the revenue in this appeal reads as under:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in upholding the decision of the CIT(A) who allowed the expenses of Rs.10,36,375/- and deprec...

Decision: The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4051 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-8 ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Winsell Electronics Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for appellant.None for respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C. :- 1.The question of law framed by the revenue in this appeal reads as under:- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in upholding the decision of the CIT(A) who allowed the expenses of Rs.10,36,375/- and depreciation of Rs.25,457/- although the assessee's business had not commenced during the relevant period ? " The finding of fact recorded by the Tribunal is that in the present case, the assessee had manufactured the machine on trial basis and ultimately sold the said machine for valid consideration. Thus, the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the assessee has used the machinery during the assessment year in question and was entitled to claim deduction of expenses and also depreciation. The finding recorded by the Tribunal is a finding of fact and no question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (R.M. SAVANT, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan