In Itxa/407/2004 Of Contract Advertising (India) Pvt.ltd v. Depuaty Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Splrange-I Mumbai And Anr, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Decision: Both the Appeals are allowed to be withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Income Tax Appeal No.407 of 2004
with
Income Tax Appeal No.449 of 2004
Contract Advertising (India) Pvt.
Ltd. .. .. Appellants
v/s.
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
& anr. .. .. Respondents
Mr.Atul Jasani for appellants.
Mr.A.S.Rao for respondents.
-----
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 13th December 2005
P.C. :
1. Mr.Jasani appearing for the appellants in
both the above matters states that the issue which
is sought to be raised in this Appeal is decided
against the assessee in the earlier decision. He
has drawn our attention to the order passed by a
Division Bench of this Court in Income Tax Appeal
No.221 of 2003 decided on 4th October 2004 in
which one of us (Devadhar, J.) was a member. This
being the position, he has instructions to withdraw
both the Appeals.
2. Both the Appeals are allowed to be
withdrawn. Court fees be refunded as per the
rules.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
-2-
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.