Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/407/2004 Of Contract Advertising (I...

Itxa/407/2004 Of Contract Advertising (India) Pvt.ltd v. Depuaty Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Splrange-I Mumbai And Anr

High Court 13 Dec 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/407/2004 Of Contract Advertising (India) Pvt.ltd v. Depuaty Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Splrange-I Mumbai And Anr
Date of order
13 Dec 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/407/2004 Of Contract Advertising (India) Pvt.ltd v. Depuaty Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Splrange-I Mumbai And Anr, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Decision: Both the Appeals are allowed to be withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Income Tax Appeal No.407 of 2004 with Income Tax Appeal No.449 of 2004 Contract Advertising (India) Pvt. Ltd. .. .. Appellants v/s. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & anr. .. .. Respondents Mr.Atul Jasani for appellants. Mr.A.S.Rao for respondents. ----- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 13th December 2005 P.C. : 1. Mr.Jasani appearing for the appellants in both the above matters states that the issue which is sought to be raised in this Appeal is decided against the assessee in the earlier decision. He has drawn our attention to the order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.221 of 2003 decided on 4th October 2004 in which one of us (Devadhar, J.) was a member. This being the position, he has instructions to withdraw both the Appeals. 2. Both the Appeals are allowed to be withdrawn. Court fees be refunded as per the rules. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) -2- (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan