Itxa/4109/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4,Mumbai v. M/S Nandkishore And Co
High Court
07 May 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/4109/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4,Mumbai v. M/S Nandkishore And Co
Date of order
07 May 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/4109/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4,Mumbai v. M/S Nandkishore And Co, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2330 OF 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2330 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Nankishore & Co. ..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 7TH MAY, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the rival
parties. Learned counsel for the revenue fairly
states that the same is covered by the Division Bench
judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of
Commissioner ofIncome Tax V/s. Walfort Share and Stock BrokersP.Ltd. reported in [2009] 310 I.T.R. 421. Moreover,
Income Tax V/s. Walfort Share and Stock Brokers
P.Ltd.
the tax impact in the present case is less than Rs.4
lakhs. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini
with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.