Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/4111/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/4111/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-6,Mum v. Tata Infomedia Ltd

High Court 08 May 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/4111/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-6,Mum v. Tata Infomedia Ltd
Date of order
08 May 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/4111/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-6,Mum v. Tata Infomedia Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 180 matter, the appeal is dismissed in limini as no substantial question of law arise.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.2463 OF 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.2463 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Tata Infomedia Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.S.S.Shetty for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 8TH MAY, 2009. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 8TH MAY, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the parties. Both the parties agree that the issue sought to be raised in the appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of C.I.T. V/s. Bhor C.I.T. V/s. Bhor Industries Ltd. 264 I.T.R. 180 Industries Ltd. 264 I.T.R. 180. In this view of the Industries Ltd. 264 I.T.R. 180 matter, the appeal is dismissed in limini as no substantial question of law arise. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan