Itxa/411/2004 Of Industrial Oxygen Co. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Spl. Rg.4 Pune
High Court
03 Jul 2006 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/411/2004 Of Industrial Oxygen Co. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Spl. Rg.4 Pune
Date of order
03 Jul 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/411/2004 Of Industrial Oxygen Co. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Spl. Rg.4 Pune, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
-= : 1 : =-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.411 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.411 OF 2004
Industrial Oxygen Co. Ltd. ..Appellant.
V/s.
Dy.Commissioner of Income tax ..Respondent.
Mr.S.N.Inamdar with Mr.Pramod Vaidya for appellant.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale i/b. A.S.Rao for respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 3RD JULY, 2006.
DATED : 3RD JULY, 2006.
P.C.:
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
In view of the Judgment of this Court in the case of
Nectar Beverages Pvt. Ltd. V/s. Dy.Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Assessment) reported in 2004(267) I.T.R.385, the question raised needs no fresh adjudication at the hands of this Court. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue