Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/41/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Itxa/41/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax , Central Iii v. M/S Sandesh Land Pvt. Ltd

High Court 11 Jul 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/41/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax , Central Iii v. M/S Sandesh Land Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
11 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
2008-09, 2009-10
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/41/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax , Central Iii v. M/S Sandesh Land Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 5.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed, as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 41 OF 2014 Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-III,Mumbai v/s. .. Appellant M/s. Sandesh Land Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent Mr. Ashok Kotangale i/b Ms. Padma Divakar for the appellant Mr. Raj Darak a/w P.C. Tripathi for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J. P.C. DATED : 11[th] JULY, 2016. 1.Heard. This appeal relates to A.Y. 2008-09. 2.Mr. Kotangale, learned Counsel for the Revenue states that the impugned order of the Tribunal also disposed of the respondent assessee's appeal for A.Y. 2009-10. The tax effect in both the appeals filed by the Revenue for the A.Y. 2008-09 and 2009-10 is less than the limits prescribed by the Circular No.21 of 2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax dated 10th December, 2015. 3.Mr. Kotangale, further points out that the appeal of the Revenue for A.Y. 2009-10 being Income Tax Appeal No. 131 of 2014 was dismissed as not pressed as the tax effect therein was Rs.4.4 lakhs. 4.In the present case also, the tax effect is Rs.6.05 lakhs as mentioned in paragraph 11A of the Appeal Memo. In view of the above, Mr. Kotangale, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue does not press the present appeal. 5.Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed, as not pressed. 6.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules. (A.K. MENON, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan