In Itxa/414/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Viii,Mumbai v. M/S Silver Plastochem Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 99 (S.C.) Appeal stands dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.414 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.414 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Silver Plastochem Chemicals Pvt.Ltd...Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for appellant.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 10TH JULY, 2006.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the apellant. So
far as the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is
concerned, it is squarely covered by the Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Berger Paints India Ltd.V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 2004 (266)I.T.R. 99 (S.C.).
I.T.R. 99 (S.C.)
Appeal stands dismissed in limini with no order
as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue